The MEI examines how inclusive municipal laws, policies, and services are of LGBTQ+ people who live and work there. Cities are rated based on non-discrimination laws, the municipality as an employer, municipal services, law enforcement and leadership on LGBTQ+ equality.
The 2025 MEI is the fourteenth annual edition and rates a total of 506 cities on 49 different criteria from every state in the nation. The MEI is the only comprehensive nationwide assessment of LGBTQ+ equality in the areas of municipal policies, laws and services.
Produced by the HRC Foundation
| Issue Brief | Launch PDF |
|---|---|
| Chasing 100: Why (Even Slow) Progress Matters As Much As the Perfect Score | Read the Brief |
| "Can One Standard Really Fit Every City?" Fair Standards, Real Constraints, and Why Consistency Matters When Measuring Municipal Equality | Read the Brief |
| Mayors Playbook: Toolkit for LGBTQ+ Municipal Equality | Read the Brief |
| The U.S. Conference of Mayors Has Long Championed the Rights of the LGBTQ+ Community | Read the Brief |
| The Persistent Problem of Preemption | Read the Brief |
| Why Municipal Equality Matters in the Midst of a National LGBTQ+ State of Emergency | Read the Brief |
| Overcoming State Preemption to Protect LGBTQ+ Rights in 2023 | Read the Brief |
| Municipalities Have the Power to Implement LGBTQ+ Inclusive Abortion Rights | Read the Brief |
| Trans-Inclusive Health Benefits | Read the Brief |
| Cities Can Be More Supportive of the Transgender and Non-Binary Communities: Here’s How | Read the Brief |
| Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia Supreme Court decision | Read the Brief |
| Addressing an Epidemic of Anti-Transgender Violence: What Cities Can Do | Read the Brief |
| Expanding PrEP Access to Help End the HIV Epidemic | Read the Brief |
| Achieving A Healthier, Stronger Workforce Through Inclusive Paid Leave | Read the Brief |
| Working Toward a Fully-Inclusive Municipal Workplace | Read the Brief |
| Addressing the Unique Needs of LGBTQ+ Older People | Read the Brief |
| Protecting Youth from Harmful "Conversion Therapy" | Read the Brief |
| Addressing Systemic Racism Through Municipal Action | Read the Brief |
| Equal Access to Sex-Segregated Facilities | Read the Brief |
| The Imperative of Responsible Hate Crime Reporting | Read the Brief |
| The Case for Retaining Domestic Partnership Laws and Policies | Read the Brief |
Learn about the 2025 MEI scorecard, read our standards of credit, and submit your city to be rated.
Cities and towns around the country are stepping up each and every day, finding new and innovative ways to empower LGBTQ+ people in the face of a dire national state of emergency. Even when anti-LGBTQ+ extremists in state capitals are working to undermine their progress, mayors and city councilmembers keep fighting to make sure that LGBTQ+ people in their communities - especially trans people - are supported and lifted up to the fullest extent possible. This year’s Municipal Equality Index shows the results of their dedication, while acknowledging the increasingly hostile environment in which they must govern.
The scorecards for each of the 506 cities rated, in addition to self-submit cities, in the most recently published MEI can be viewed at the See Your City’s Score page or the Municipality Database.
The cities selected for rating are: the 50 state capitals, the 200 largest cities in the United States, the five largest cities or municipalities in each state, the cities home to the state’s two largest public universities (including undergraduate and graduate enrollment), 75 cities with high proportions of same-sex couples drawn from an analysis of the 2010 Census results by the Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law which ranked the 25 large cities (population exceeding 250,000), 25 mid-size cities (population between 100,000 and 250,000), and 25 small cities (population below 100,000) and 98 cities selected by HRC and Equality Federation state groups members and supporters in 2016.
Washington, D.C. is not rated by the MEI, even though it has a high proportion of same-sex couples and fits into several of the city selection criteria. Unlike the cities rated in the MEI, however, Washington D.C. is a federal district. This means that it has powers and limitations so significantly different from the municipalities the MEI rates that the comparison would be unfair—for example, no city rated by the MEI has the legal capacity to pass marriage equality, like Washington, D.C. did in 2009. While the District of Columbia is not a state either, it is more properly compared to a state than it is to a city. For that reason, Washington, D.C. is included in HRC’s annual State Equality Index. Washington, D.C.’s laws and policies can be viewed on the District of Columbia state scorecard.
A few of the places rated in the MEI are “census-designated places” which are not incorporated as cities. In that case, we rated the local incorporated government that actually serves that census-designated place, which is usually the county.
Cities are rated on a scale of 0-100, based on the city’s laws, policies, benefits, and services. There are 100 standard points and 22 flex points (flex points are awarded for items which apply to some but not all cities). All public scores are capped at 100 points.
The information reflected in the MEI is gathered by the MEI team and compiled into draft scorecards using publicly available resources. Cities are offered an opportunity to review the scorecards, ask any questions, and submit any additional information they wish the MEI team to consider for rating. Our team sends out a letter via certified mail to mayors and city managers notifying them that their cities will be rated by email, followed by a draft scorecard sent to the mayors and city managers also via email and certified mail. Cities are given a feedback window to provide additional documentation and request changes to their scorecard. Finally, cities are sent their final scorecards before the final report is released to the public. Advocacy organizations in various states across the country are able to review the scorecards and provide feedback to the MEI team prior to publication as well.
Definitely not. The MEI was specifically designed to measure the laws and policies of the municipality, not the state. While state law might add to a city’s score, positive state law is not necessary for a city to score 100 points. Cities that score over 85 in states without non-discrimination laws that expressly include LGBTQ+ people are designated as “All-Star” cities.
This is not a ranking of a city’s atmosphere or quality of life. It is an evaluation of the city’s law and policies, and an examination of how inclusive city services are of LGBTQ+ people. Some high-scoring cities may not feel truly welcoming for all LGBTQ+ people, and some low-scoring cities may feel more welcoming than their policies might reflect.
The Human Rights Campaign reports on news, events and resources of the Human Rights Campaign Foundation that are of interest to the general public and further our common mission to support the LGBTQ+ community.