Home >>July 27, 2008 |
|
| |
17th Sunday of Ordinary Time (Proper 12), Year A |
July 27, 2008 |
All Things Working Together for Good
Today’s Bible passages invite us to embrace the ways God is working in us for the good of all people as we challenge attitudes and theology, even definitions of marriage, that can separate us from loving one another.
This week's lectionary Bible passages:
Genesis 29:15-28 &
Psalm 128; Romans 8:26-39; Matthew 13:31-33, 44-52 (1 Kings 3:5-12 & Psalm 119:129-136; Psalm
105:1-11,45b commentary not included) |
|

Who's in the
Conversation
A conversation among the following scholars
and pastors
|
 |
 |
 |
“Nothing can separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus – that includes
attitudes and theological positions as well as angels and principalities.”
Mona West |
“Regardless of the rhetoric, no one who takes the Bible seriously
wants a biblical marriage – for such a marriage would encourage polygamy, marrying girls once they reached puberty and making war booty
into sex slaves."
Miguel De La Torre |
“Today’s Bible passages celebrate the intimacy that is possible in God – intimacy built on
love, trusting each other and being present to one another even when times get tough.”
Deborah Appler
|

What's Out in the
Conversation
A conversation about this week's lectionary
Bible passages
Romans 8:26-39 is part of a larger passage in Paul’s letter to the Romans in
which Paul names the reality of suffering in human lives and in creation. Paul also names the reality of hope in the midst of suffering
that is grounded in our future in God and in the Spirit’s presence with us, “groaning” with us, interceding for us and helping us in our
weakness.
Verse 28 is often quoted out of context, “We know that all things work together for good for those
who love God, who are called according to God’s purpose.” For some this verse has come to mean that if people suffer then they are not
called by God or loved by God. For others the approach has been to trivialize suffering by claiming God will eventually salvage our
suffering and turn it into something good. In its context, however, the force of this verse suggests that God is present to us and at
work for good in us in all things — even suffering.
Verses 31-39 sound more like a hymn, a song of God’s love for creation in all its myriad forms,
rather than a doctrine or theological proposition. Miguel De La Torre reflects, “When I converted to Christianity, the church community
I belonged to taught me what being a Christian meant. Unfortunately, they fused and confused their social and political views with
biblical interpretations. Some of those views – as those which were homophobic – when uncritically accepted as biblical – caused
separation between God and the object of God’s love. Honestly, this is a contradiction to the promise of verses 38 & 39. These early
views which I adopted, although believing they were in-line with God’s will, actually caused obstacles for relationship between God and
those for whom Christ suffered. But the good news is that regardless of death, angels, princes, powers or even my misunderstanding of
Christianity, none of this can separate the LGBT community from the love of God."
 |
 |
In your personal
journey of faith are there beliefs and views that you once held that are different now? What are they? |
|
For Mona West, this has been a very powerful passage from the apostle Paul for LGBT people: “’If God is for us, who is
against us?’ (verse 31) ‘Nothing can separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus’ (verse 39). I can remember the palpable feeling
of hope in the room when these verses were read at a funeral for a young man who had died of AIDS in the early years of the pandemic. Even
though there were those in his own family who had been ‘against’ him as a gay man and there were others who believed that certainly AIDS
had ‘separated’ him from God and those who could not bring themselves to physically touch him in life or in death, this promise from
Romans 8 resounded throughout the church of his childhood. Nothing in life or in death could separate him from the love of God in Christ
Jesus.”
Genesis 29:15-28 is part of a larger narrative cycle concerning the patriarch Isaac’s sons, Jacob and
Esau. The tables are turned on Jacob who earlier ‘tricked’ Esau out of his birthright (Genesis 25-28). Now it is Jacob who is ‘tricked’
by his father-in-law Laban who gives him his daughter Leah instead of his daughter Rachel on the wedding night. This story in Genesis 29
sets up a fierce competition between Leah and Rachel to see who can produce more sons for Jacob. A woman’s worth was measured in this
patriarchal society by the men she belonged to (husband or father) or the male offspring she produced. Today oppressive systems and
structures often pit LGBT people against other marginalized groups. In our efforts to “fight over the same piece of the pie” the dominant
culture has chosen to give us, we fail to work together to make sure the “whole pie” is shared.
Deborah Appler points out that although the lectionary cuts off the rest of Leah and Rachel’s story, these two women do
form an alliance at times within the restrictions of their patriarchal marriage. Some Jewish interpretations, midrashim, suggest
that, maybe out of respect for tradition or out of love for her sister, Rachel shares information with Leah to help her deceive Jacob so
that she will be cared for. Another suggests that Rachel might have talked to Jacob under the bed when Jacob and Leah consummated the
marriage. Although Rachel and Leah’s ultimate goal was to have sex with Jacob in order to produce children, Leah and Rachel shared
mandrakes (Genesis 30), an ancient plant believed to be both an aphrodisiac and to increase fertility. Both of these women are revered in
the Jewish tradition as mothers of Israel. Again, even when they work together, they seek to fit in with the system as it stands and there
is a competition.
This reading of the marriage between Jacob, Rachel and Leah complicates the picture of marriage found in Psalm
128 and today. One hears much rhetoric from the radical right about the need to return to a biblical definition
of marriage, but as the Genesis text illustrates, imposing a biblical definition of marriage upon modern society is oppressive, especially
for women. These biblical values are based on the assumption that women’s bodies are chattel that can be sold or traded in return for
seven years of labor. Men could acquire these women as possession once they reached puberty and could produce children. A literal
acceptance of the biblical marriage would allow for polygamy. Fortunately the definition of marriage evolved to what it is today for most
Westerners – a relationship based on love, not on obtaining female bodies, or creating financial security or insuring reproduction. Just
as the definition of marriage has evolved toward a love-based relationship, maybe in the next stage we will care less about the gender of
those adults entering into marriage and more about marriage as a mutual and self-giving relationship.
|
 |
 |
How might the definition of marriage continue to
evolve in your community of faith? |
|
The parables in Matthew 13:31-33, 44-52 are part of a larger chapter in Matthew in which Jesus talks
with his disciples about his use of parables. The parables of the mustard seed and the yeast proclaim that although seemingly
imperceptible, God’s action is still at work in the world and in us (in Paul’s words from Romans 8—with utterances too deep for words).
While the parables of the treasure in the field and the pearl of great value emphasize not the finding, but the overwhelming response made
to the discovery. God’s work, no matter how big or how small, always calls for human response.
Those within the LGBT community who are declaring their Christian beliefs are this mustard seed. They are little
when compared to the more established organizations that would prefer this seed not be planted in the fields of faith at all. But like the
mustard seed, the contributions that the LGBT community can make to the broader faith community could be so big that straight and LGBT
biblical scholars, theologians and ethicists would be able to find rest upon its branches.
Prayerfully Out in
Scripture

|
Pray Romans 8:38-39 as a breath prayer.
On the ‘in breath,’ pray “nothing can separate us.”
On the ‘out breath,’ pray “from the love of God.”
On the ‘in breath,’ pray “in Christ Jesus.”
On the ‘out breath,’ pray “in Christ Jesus.”
After praying this prayer several times, write in a journal or share your experience aloud with a
group.
|

|
Bible passages are
selected based on the Revised Common Lectionary, copyright © 1992 by Co
|
|
|
|
|