by Brandon Wolf •
April 2025
Introduction
With Florida State Sen. Randy Fine’s recent (closer than expected) election to Congress, we can expect him to take his ugly anti-LGBTQ+ animus from Tallahassee to Washington, D.C. But the pipeline of hate from state legislatures to Congress has gone on far longer than Florida’s latest special election. What can look like disparate attacks in state legislatures targeting the rights and freedoms of LGBTQ+ people are actually all part of one national strategy to use states as beta testing grounds for the right wing’s anti-freedom agenda–with the ultimate goal of enacting these policies at a federal level. Project 2025 may be new to Washington, but it seems awfully familiar to people in states like Florida, Texas, Tennessee, and others.
Over the last several years, state legislatures have lurched from bans on sports participation for transgender youth to restrictions on bathroom access and health care to censorship of LGBTQ+ content and people from classrooms to a recent surge in resolutions demanding that the Supreme Court overturn its Obergefell ruling that made marriage equality the law of the land. And at each step, bills across multiple states mirror each other–as they are all influenced by right wing organizations linked to the national Project 2025 manifesto like the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) and the Heritage Foundation.
The state level policy trends, as well as information about the organizations driving the rash of anti-LGBTQ+ hate in America, can give insight into where anti-equality majorities in Congress and the Trump-Vance Administration may go next.
Anti-LGBTQ+ Bills in State Legislatures are a Coordinated Effort
Over the years, trends have emerged in state legislatures as particular types of bills are filed en masse as part of a broader effort to divide and conquer LGBTQ+ rights. Initially, these bills targeted marriage equality directly and indirectly. Bills that would erode or eliminate legal protections on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity under the guise of protecting religious belief continue to be introduced and passed even in 2025. But starting in 2020 opponents of LGBTQ+ equality explicitly - and admittedly - began attacking transgender youth.
2020
79 bills were introduced that targeted transgender people specifically, including 32 bills banning transgender students from playing school sports as well as 26 bans on transgender healthcare for adolescents. The first anti-trans sports bill - drafted by ADF - was passed in Idaho, and was enjoined almost immediately. ADF joined the litigation to defend the law. When the AP did investigative reporting on the influx of sports bans introduced across the country, it found that “in almost every case, sponsors cannot cite a single instance in their own state or region where such participation had caused problems.” In the same article, ADF cites back to its own test lawsuit in Connecticut, where it raised the question of transgender students participating in sports nationally for the first time.
2021
150 bills that targeted transgender people specifically were filed, including 84 bills that would ban trangender students from playing school sports - 9 of these 84 passed into law. Nine bathroom bills were filed, as were 45 bills banning transgender healthcare. Arkansas passed the first ban on transgender healthcare into law, overriding the Governor’s veto, using a model law pushed by the right-wing.
2022
351 anti-LGBTQ bills were filed in 2022, with 150 of them specifically targeting transgender people. 29 anti-LGBTQ+ bills were passed into law, 11 of which were bans on transgender youth playing sports (of 82 introduced) and 3 related to gender-affirming care (of 44 introduced). Of these, one banned only surgery, which is not generally available to minors. Two bills preventing students from accessing safe bathrooms at schools passed.
The emerging trend in 2022, however, was the rhetoric around teachers, books, and curriculum being responsible for allegedly teaching students how to be LGBTQ+. Seventy-three bills were filed to censor curriculum, ban books, or otherwise attempt to regulate how educators could relate to LGBTQ+ students, including the infamous “Don’t Say LGBTQ+” bill in Florida that year. The conversation generated by the far right around this bill, including by the SPLC-designated hate group Moms for Liberty, echoed Anita Bryant’s infamous “Save Our Children” rhetoric, with a few far-right influencers reintroducing the phrase “groomer” to describe any person who didn’t support their censorship.
In a matter of mere days, just ten people drove 66% of impressions for the 500 most viewed hateful “grooming” tweets — including Gov. Ron DeSantis’s press secretary Christina Pushaw, extremist members of Congress like Marjorie Taylor Greene and Lauren Boebert, and far-right figures like “Libs of TikTok” founder Chaya Raicheck. Posts from these 10 people alone reached more than 48 million views, and the top 500 most influential “grooming” tweets all together were seen 72 million times. Then, in 2023, more than 100 bills were filed in state legislatures to censor curriculum and school library collections.
2023
The number of specifically anti-transgender bills filed rocketed to 257 (up from 147 in 2022), with 146 of those bills limiting or preventing transgender health care. By the end of 2023 - only 2 years after the first such bill passed into law - 23 states banned gender-affirming care in some way, including nearly every state with Republican majorities in the legislature and control of the Governorship. Groups like Family Policy Alliance and Family Research Council claimed credit for helping to craft this legislation, Steven Miller’s America First Legal supported it, and ADF defended Alabama’s ban on transgender health care in court.
In addition to the focus on curriculum censorship mentioned above, other bills that gained traction in 2023 were bills that purported to define sex in a way that excluded LGBTQ+ people, thereby removing important legal protections throughout the state’s legal code, and a bill known as the “Women’s Bill of Rights” which prevents transgender women from having access to spaces such as bathrooms, locker rooms, women’s correctional facilities, and domestic violence shelters.
2024
The focus on curriculum censorship and banning books continued, as did the emphasis on banning healthcare for transgender people. However, the focus of the latter shifted to healthcare paid for with public funds, including Medicaid, state CHIP, healthcare for people who are incarcerated, and for anyone who receives healthcare through a plan paid for with taxpayer dollars, using state facilities, or provided by a state employee. In most cases this includes healthcare for people who are employed by the state, city, county, public university or university hospital, as well as their dependents. This meant a surge in legislation now targeting access to care for transgender adults in addition to young people. The Heritage Foundation promoted this model.
2025 (Thus far)
In addition to the other efforts to strip LGBTQ+ people of freedoms, there has been a surge in resolutions filed by state lawmakers demanding that the Supreme Court reverse its decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which affirmed marriage equality as the law of the land.
National Anti-LGBTQ+ Groups Are The Puppet Masters
Congress and the White House Are Taking Their Cues
The Pipeline of Hate is Not Just Policy – It’s Personnel
To make a general inquiry, please visit our contact page. Members of the media can reach our press office at: (202) 572-8968 or email press@hrc.org.
Image: